[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” da_disable_devices=”off|off|off” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” da_is_popup=”off” da_exit_intent=”off” da_has_close=”on” da_alt_close=”off” da_dark_close=”off” da_not_modal=”on” da_is_singular=”off” da_with_loader=”off” da_has_shadow=”on”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” text_font=”Brother 1816 Bold||||||||” text_text_color=”#FFFFFF” header_text_color=”#FFFFFF” background_color=”#18988B” custom_margin=”-9px||6px||false|false” custom_padding=”31px||9px|17px|false|false” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]
Establishment of Ch’ihilii Chìk HPA
[/et_pb_text][dvmd_table_maker tbl_stripes_active=”on” _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ border_width_all=”2px” border_color_all=”#80C7BC” box_shadow_style=”preset2″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” tbl_top_left_mode=”on” tbl_hover_active=”horz” tbl_hover_apply=”on|off|on|on|on” sticky_enabled=”0″][dvmd_table_maker_item col_label=”Title:” col_content=”
Type:
LMUs affected:
Date of Amendment:
Trigger:
Key element of Plan:” col_icon_type=”%||divi||400″ _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” col_column_max_width=”0.3fr” sticky_enabled=”0″][/dvmd_table_maker_item][dvmd_table_maker_item col_label=”Information” col_content=”Description
Amendment
8A
~2010
Implementation of the Plan
Recommendation in section 4.2.1″ _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][/dvmd_table_maker_item][/dvmd_table_maker][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content” sticky_enabled=”0″]
The recommendation in section 4.2.1 of the Plans states:
LMU 8A, Whitefish – Porcupine Lakes, a sub-unit of Whitefish Wetlands, should be designated a Protected Area category . This area includes part of VG R-02A in the central portion of Whitefish Lakes and YG public land around Porcupine Lakes on the west bank of Porcupine River.
In 2010, the Parties agreed to make these changes; in 2019 they signed a management plan for a new Habitat Protection Area “Ch’ihilii Chìk”. The boundary of this HPA is nearly identical to that in the approved plan.
[/et_pb_text][dvmd_table_maker _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” theme_builder_area=”post_content” tbl_top_left_mode=”on” tbl_title_mode=”on” tbl_title_text=”Specific changes to plan” tbl_stripes_active=”on” tbl_stripes_apply=”on|off|on|on|on” tbl_hover_active=”horz” tbl_hover_apply=”on|off|on|on|on” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″ box_shadow_style=”preset2″][dvmd_table_maker_item _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” theme_builder_area=”post_content” col_label=”Section” col_content=”Section
4.2.1
4.2.1
4.2.1
6
6
6
6
Appendix 1″ hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″ col_column_max_width=”0fr”][/dvmd_table_maker_item][dvmd_table_maker_item _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” theme_builder_area=”post_content” col_content=”Page(s)
4-2
4-2
4-3
6-21 – 6-24
6-22
6-21
6-21
Map 1″ hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″ col_label=”Pages” col_column_max_width=”0fr”][/dvmd_table_maker_item][dvmd_table_maker_item _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” theme_builder_area=”post_content” col_content=”Details
References to %22Whitefish Wetlands%22 should be changed to “Ch’ihilii Chìk” (or “Ch’ihilii Chìk/Whitefish Wetlands”)
Recommendation box should be removed OR changed to IMPLEMENTED box (or similar)
Figure 4.1 should portray the updated boundary & name(s)
Name of LMU should be updated
The map should have updated boundaries and title.
LMU 8A designation should be updated to Habitat Protection Area
Special Management Consideration #1 should be updated, with a link for more information.
The map should have updated boundaries and lables.” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″ col_label=”Details”][/dvmd_table_maker_item][dvmd_table_maker_item _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” theme_builder_area=”post_content” col_label=”Status” col_content=”Status
Unchanged
Unchanged
Unchanged (and unchanged on LMU webpage)
Unchanged
Unchanged (online GIS only updated boundaries)
Unchanged
Unchanged
Unchanged” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″ col_column_max_width=”0.5fr”][/dvmd_table_maker_item][/dvmd_table_maker][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row column_structure=”1_2,1_2″ disabled_on=”on|on|on” _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” disabled=”on” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”1_2″ _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]
Before:
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=”https://planyukon.ca/wp-content/uploads/map1-land-use-categories-and-IMA-zones_OIC_original_crop_extra_sm.png” title_text=”map1- land use categories and IMA zones_OIC_original_crop_extra_sm” _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″ _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]
After:
[/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=”https://planyukon.ca/wp-content/uploads/map1-land-use-categories-and-IMA-zones_OIC_update_Jan2012_crop_extra_sm_stars.png” title_text=”map1- land use categories and IMA zones_OIC_update_Jan2012_crop_extra_sm_stars” _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row disabled_on=”on|on|on” _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” disabled=”on” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.0″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}” theme_builder_area=”post_content”]
Left: map in the original approved plan. Right: map after ammendment (stars added here for clarity). Note the removal of the green hatching indicatin a land withdrawal.
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]